Industrial Consumption of Energy (ICE) Survey, 2020

Statistics Canada annually conducts the Industrial Consumption of Energy (ICE) survey (co-sponsored by the Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE) of Natural Resources Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada). The survey collects energy use data from establishments in Canada’s Manufacturing sector. The survey is an essential tool for monitoring the evolution of energy consumption by manufacturing industries and helps to fulfill part of the OEE’s mandate to strengthen and expand Canada’s commitment to energy efficiency.
This statistical report examines energy use patterns for the Canadian Manufacturing sector using the results of the 2020 ICE survey. The estimates are based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and include all 21 subsectors (three-digit code) of the Manufacturing sector (NAICS 31 to 33).
Key facts
- Energy intensity increased 2.1% in the manufacturing sector in 2020 from 2019 in part due to the impact of COVID-19, which led to underutilized manufacturing facilities. Energy intensity in 2020 was still 9.5% below its 2009 peak, mostly resulting from shifts to less energy-intensive industries, and efficiency improvement.
- Three-quarters of total manufacturing energy use comes from four subsectors: paper, primary metal, chemical, and petroleum and coal product.
- Fuel mix in manufacturing is evolving – natural gas is accounting for an increasing share of total energy consumption and electricity use is stable.
- Significant reductions were evident in the consumption of many energy sources in the Manufacturing sector. Most notably the usage of heavy fuel oil decreased by 95.3% from 2000 to 2020.
Manufacturing continued to decrease Energy Consumption and GDP in 2020
Energy consumption in the manufacturing sector decreased by 0.1% from 2018 to 2019 Footnote 1 and decreased by 7.7% from 2019 to 2020 Footnote 2 . The sector GDP decreased by 0.1% between 2018 and 2019 Footnote 1 and decreased by 9.6% between 2019 and 2020 Footnote 2 . The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 could be one possible explanation for this significant decrease in energy consumption and GDP, that led to the underutilization of manufacturing facilities.
| Total Manufacturing (NAICS 31-33) |
Change in energy consumption |
Change in GDP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (PJ) | (%) | (billion $) | |
| 2018 to 2019 Footnote a | -0.10 | -1.5 | -0.10 | -0.1 |
| 2019 to 2020 Footnote b | -7.70 | -168.7 | -9.60 | -19.0 |
Change in Energy Consumption by Subsector
Figure 3 highlights some of the most significant changes in energy consumption levels that occurred in subsectors that had large fluctuations in outputs, including:
- Energy consumption in paper manufacturing decreased 38.5 percent from 2000 to 2020 (associated GDP decreased by 39.8 percent).
- Food Manufacturing consumed 14.8 percent more energy in 2020 compared to 2000 (associated GDP increased by 33.7 percent).
- Energy consumption in non-metallic mineral product decreased by 21.6 percent from 2000 to 2020 (associated GDP increased by 16.1 percent).
Text version
| Subsector | Energy consumption (PJ) | |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2020 | |
| Paper (NAICS 322) | 883.4 | 543.2 |
| Primary Metal (NAICS 331) | 536.4 | 449.7 |
| Chemical (NAICS 325) | 295.0 | 261.6 |
| Petroleum and Coal Products (NAICS 324) | 325.9 | 274.5 |
| Wood Products (NAICS 321) | 129.4 | 135.5 |
| Food (NAICS 311) | 94.6 | 108.6 |
| Non-Metallic Mineral Products (NAICS 327) | 121.2 | 95.0 |
Change in Energy Consumption by Fuel Source
The fuel mix used by the manufacturing sector has changed since the 2008/09 recession with natural gas representing 31.5 percent of energy use in 2020, up from 27 percent in 2009, while electricity use has remained constant during that period (29 percent share). The price of natural gas fell from 33.5¢ per cubic metre (¢/m3) in 2008 to 11.2¢/m3 in 2020 while industrial electricity prices, on a national basis, increased 23 percent from 7.1¢/kWh in 2008 to 8.8¢/kWh in 2020. Increased use of natural gas could be attributed to industries looking to reduce their carbon emissions, as natural gas is a cleaner burning fossil fuel, as well as to the lower natural gas prices.
| Energy source | Energy Consumption (PJ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
| Natural gas | 675.9 | 685.9 | 637.0 |
| Electricity | 629.5 | 636.7 | 602.8 |
While the total sector saw a reduction in energy consumption, in 2019, the energy consumption values for the two largest energy using fuel sources in the manufacturing sector (natural gas and electricity) increased in comparison to their respective 2018 values. However, in 2020, the energy consumption values for natural gas and electricity decreased from both the 2018 and 2019 values.
Significant reductions were evident in the consumption of many energy sources from 2000 to 2020, in particular heavy fuel oil, propane, middle distillates, coal, coke, and spent pulping liquor, whereas the use of steam increased substantially as surplus steam produced during power generation and industrial processes was being recovered. Most notably the use of heavy fuel oil in the manufacturing sector decreased by 95.3 percent. According to Statistics Canada, heavy fuel oil is second only to coal as a carbon-intensive fuel, and as such has been the target of environmental restrictions on emissions. The decline can thus be attributed to manufacturers substituting other energy sources, as well as the reduced use of energy overall by users of heavy fuel oil. The petroleum and coal product manufacturing subsector has experienced the largest reduction in the use of heavy fuel oil, by 97.5 percent from 2000 to 2020.
| Energy source | 2000 Energy (PJ) | 2020 Energy (PJ) | Growth, 2000–2020 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural gas | 782.8 | 637.0 | -18.6 |
| Electricity | 690.2 | 602.8 | -12.7 |
| Coal | 49.1 | 29.9 | -39.0 |
| Coke | 103.4 | 65.2 | -36.9 |
| Coke oven gas | 27.1 | 21.0 | -22.4 |
| Petroleum coke and coke from catalytic cracking catalyst | 68.4 | 68.6 | 0.2 |
| Heavy fuel oil | 139.2 | 6.5 | -95.3 |
| Middle distillates | 24.9 | 15.9 | -36.2 |
| Propane | 13.2 | 8.0 | -39.7 |
| Refinery fuel gas | 151.4 | 122.2 | -19.3 |
| Butane | .. | 1.4 | n/a |
| Spent pulping liquor | 319.7 | 225.1 | -29.6 |
| Steam | 37.4 | 45.5 | 21.8 |
| Wood | 190.2 | 173.7 | -8.7 |
| Total | 2,597.0 | 2,022.8 | -22.1 |
Legend:
| .. | Not available for a specific reference period. |
| n/a | Not applicable. |
Energy intensity increased in manufacturing in 2020
After a brief pause during the 2008/09 recession, manufacturing energy intensity Footnote 3 was on a decline till 2019. However, in 2020, the energy intensity in manufacturing sector increased by 2.1%. In 2020, energy intensity was about 9.5 percent below the pre-recession peak of 2009, while it was 11.4 percent below the pre-recession peak of 2009, in 2019. Longer term, energy intensity still declined 8.4 percent from 2000 to 2020 Footnote 4 . This represents an absolute drop in the sector’s energy use of about 574.2 petajoules (PJ), which is roughly equivalent to the amount of energy consumed by cars in Ontario, Alberta, and Saskatchewan combined in 2020 Footnote 5 .
Over the 2000-2020 period, activity in the manufacturing sector Footnote 6 shifted. The shift was from paper manufacturing, the subsector with the highest rate of energy use per unit of gross domestic product (GDP), toward less energy-intensive industries (such as chemical and food manufacturing). This change in manufacturing activity, combined with efficiency improvement in other energy-intensive subsectors, resulted in an overall reduction in energy intensity of the manufacturing sector from 12.3 megajoules per dollar of GDP (MJ/$GDP) in 2000 to 11.27 MJ/$GDP in 2020.
In 2020, the manufacturing sector generated $180 billion in GDP (constant 2012 dollars) and consumed 2,023 petajoules (PJ) of energy. This amount is roughly equal to twice the consumption of motor gasoline and diesel fuel oil in total passenger transportation in 2020 Footnote 7 .
Text version
| Year | Energy Use index (2009=100) | GDP Footnote * index | Energy intensity index |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 2010 | 103.5 | 104.8 | 98.7 |
| 2011 | 105.1 | 108.5 | 96.9 |
| 2012 | 103.2 | 110.0 | 93.8 |
| 2013 | 103.3 | 109.7 | 94.2 |
| 2014 | 103.4 | 112.9 | 91.5 |
| 2015 | 101.9 | 113.6 | 89.7 |
| 2016 | 102.9 | 113.6 | 90.6 |
| 2017 | 104.2 | 115.8 | 90.0 |
| 2018 | 105.8 | 119.3 | 88.7 |
| 2019 | 105.8 | 119.3 | 88.6 |
| 2020 | 97.6 | 107.9 | 90.5 |
The improvement in the energy intensity trend is evident over both the long and short term. The sector continued its recovery from the global economic downturn in 2009, as GDP increased steadily till 2019. Figure 1 indicates that output of the manufacturing sector had outpaced energy use, resulting in continued improvement in energy intensity till 2019. It also shows a significant decline in energy consumption and GDP, and an increase in energy intensity from 2019 to 2020, potentially due to COVID-19 induced lockdowns and their impact on the global supply chain.
An important contributor to this improvement is the Canadian Industry Partnership for Energy Conservation (CIPEC) , which supports a network of almost 2,400 facilities, and more than 50 trade associations working together to cut costs, improve energy efficiency, and reduce industrial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To encourage and support industry’s energy efficiency efforts, NRCan offers Canadian industry tools and services through CIPEC. These include benchmarking reports, best practice guides and cost-shared assistance.
Change in Energy Intensity by Subsector
Table 2 demonstrates that five of the seven most energy-consuming subsectors reported a decline in energy use in 2020 compared to 2000, with the most significant decline being in paper manufacturing (-38.5 percent). However, paper manufacturing’s energy intensity still rose by 2.1% over that period, since its GDP declined by more than its reduction in energy use. Several factors can influence the amount of energy used by a particular industry, such as its level of economic activity, its structure, and how efficiently it uses energy. Adopting more efficient energy-related processes or technologies helps an industry reduce its demand for energy. Examples are waste energy recovery and re-use, and cogeneration in the paper manufacturing subsector.
| Sector / subsector | Change in energy consumption |
Change in GDP Footnote * | Change in energy intensity |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (PJ) | (%) | (billion $) | (%) | |
| Total Manufacturing | -22.1 | -574.2 | -15.0 | -31.7 | -8.4 |
| Paper | -38.5 | -340.2 | -39.8 | -4.4 | 2.1 |
| Primary Metal | -16.2 | -86.7 | -17.1 | -2.1 | 1.1 |
| Chemical | -11.3 | -33.4 | 10.4 | 2.0 | -19.6 |
| Petroleum and Coal Products | -15.8 | -51.4 | -4.4 | -0.5 | -11.9 |
| Wood Products | 4.7 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 0.5 | -1.5 |
| Food | 14.8 | 14.0 | 33.7 | 6.5 | -14.1 |
| Non-Metallic Mineral Products | -21.6 | -26.2 | 16.1 | 0.9 | -32.5 |
Figure 2 shows that five of the seven most energy consuming subsectors experienced a decrease in energy intensity from 2000 to 2020. Significant decreases occurred for Non-Metallic Mineral Product Manufacturing (-32.5 percent), Chemical Manufacturing (-19.6 percent) and Food Manufacturing (-14.1 percent).
Text version
| Year | Subsector | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper Manufacturing (NAICS 322) | Primary Metal Manufacturing (NAICS 331) | Chemical Manufacturing (NAICS 325) | Petroleum and Coal Product Manufacturing (NAICS 324) | Wood Product Manufacturing (NAICS 321) | Food Manufacturing (NAICS 311) | Non-Metallic Mineral Product Manufacturing (NAICS 327) | |
| 2000 | 80.4 | 44.8 | 15.3 | 29.8 | 16.2 | 4.9 | 21.6 |
| 2001 | 78.7 | 44.4 | 13.8 | 28.0 | 15.6 | 4.3 | 19.7 |
| 2002 | 74.3 | 42.1 | 11.8 | 29.5 | 14.4 | 4.3 | 19.7 |
| 2003 | 74.6 | 43.3 | 11.6 | 28.5 | 14.0 | 4.4 | 18.5 |
| 2004 | 75.4 | 40.7 | 12.9 | 30.7 | 13.8 | 4.5 | 19.0 |
| 2005 | 69.0 | 39.5 | 12.9 | 28.0 | 13.3 | 4.5 | 18.2 |
| 2006 | 67.2 | 40.5 | 12.5 | 29.8 | 14.7 | 4.4 | 17.7 |
| 2007 | 67.0 | 41.1 | 13.4 | 30.4 | 15.6 | 4.5 | 18.2 |
| 2008 | 62.8 | 42.6 | 14.0 | 30.7 | 16.4 | 4.4 | 15.7 |
| 2009 | 73.1 | 47.3 | 14.6 | 28.1 | 17.2 | 4.6 | 15.7 |
| 2010 | 67.5 | 44.4 | 14.5 | 29.6 | 18.4 | 4.3 | 16.2 |
| 2011 | 68.2 | 43.2 | 15.7 | 29.8 | 17.3 | 4.4 | 18.8 |
| 2012 | 70.2 | 41.8 | 15.4 | 27.9 | 18.0 | 4.9 | 17.0 |
| 2013 | 72.4 | 41.3 | 15.9 | 27.3 | 18.7 | 4.9 | 17.8 |
| 2014 | 69.9 | 39.6 | 16.5 | 26.1 | 17.8 | 4.5 | 15.9 |
| 2015 | 69.7 | 39.9 | 15.4 | 25.5 | 16.1 | 4.4 | 15.4 |
| 2016 | 74.0 | 44.2 | 14.1 | 25.3 | 14.6 | 4.2 | 16.3 |
| 2017 | 76.7 | 43.9 | 13.3 | 25.7 | 16.6 | 4.1 | 16.6 |
| 2018 | 83.1 | 42.8 | 12.5 | 24.1 | 16.8 | 4.1 | 15.1 |
| 2019 | 86.7 | 43.9 | 12.6 | 26.1 | 16.0 | 4.1 | 14.7 |
| 2020 | 82.0 | 45.3 | 12.3 | 26.2 | 16.0 | 4.2 | 14.6 |
Yields Significant Savings of 943,653 gigajoules (GJ), equivalent to cost savings of over $6 million dollars, between 2016 and 2021
In 2010, KPLP initiated its first formal sustainability program, Sustainability 2015, outlining commitments to reduce energy, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and water consumption. Despite the challenges posed by the global pandemic, the company successfully concluded its second sustainability initiative, Sustainability 2020, exceeding three of its four targets, including reducing energy consumption intensity and Scope 1 GHG emissions intensity by 15% and 26%, respectively, since 2009.
The plant implemented an ISO 50001 Energy Management System (EnMS) between 2016 and 2021, leading to a commendable 12.92% improvement in energy performance. This achievement translated into substantial cost savings, totaling $6,488,825.22 CAD, accompanied by a noteworthy reduction of 943,653 GJ in energy consumption and a decrease of 38,300 metric tons in CO2-equivalent emissions over the same period. Notably, the Gatineau plant attained EnMS certification in 2019, enhancing real-time monitoring and fostering the development of a pathway for similar improvements across KPLP’s broader manufacturing facilities.
: From ISO 50001 Initiation to Carbon Neutrality Commitment and Positive Environmental Impact
3M initiated its ISO 50001 journey in 2011, starting with a pilot project involving two facilities: 3M Cordova in Illinois, US, and 3M Brockville in Ontario, Canada, with joint support from the US Department of Energy and Natural Resources Canada. Since then, the program has expanded globally, with 56 sites now ISO 50001 certified, and 36 of them achieving Superior Energy Performance (SEP) certification. In 2014, 3M aligned its corporate sustainability goals with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), outlining targets for corporate energy efficiency, renewable energy, and carbon neutrality by 2025.
In 2021, 3M announced a commitment to be carbon neutral by 2050 in alignment with the Paris Climate Commitment. The implementation of sustainability measures has yielded positive results, with a 4.7% improvement in normalized energy performance across 56 certified sites in the Americas from 2016 to 2021. The case study highlights key metrics including, $24 million USD in total energy cost savings, a $3,936,000 USD cost to implement the Energy Management System (EnMS), 1,758,000 GJ in total energy savings, and a reduction of 301,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions over the improvement period. The success of 3M's sustainability efforts is demonstrated through its comprehensive approach, cost-effective implementation, and significant positive environmental impact.
For a full breakdown of energy use, GDP and energy intensity for the Manufacturing sector and selected subsectors, see the OEE Web site at .
For more information on this report or on the OEE’s services, contact:
Office of Energy EfficiencyNatural Resources Canada
580 Booth Street
Ottawa ON K1A 0E4
Email: statistics_and_analysis-statistiques_et_analyses@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca
Web site:
Aussi disponible en français sous le titre: Enquête sur la consommation industrielle de l’énergie – Rapport statistique sur l’utilisation de l’énergie dans le secteur manufacturier canadien, 2000–2020.
For information regarding reproduction rights, contact Natural Resources Canada at nrcan.copyrightdroitdauteur.rncan@canada.ca .
© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2024.
The Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE) at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) changed the base year of the National Energy Use Database (NEUD) from 1990 to 2000, beginning with the release of 2018 data. This rebasing is to ensure that NEUD reflects developments in trends and structures of Canada’s energy end use and efficiency data across sectors. It also synchronizes Canada’s energy use data reporting with changes recently made by the International Energy Agency. While new estimates are no longer made available for years prior to 2000, data with the new base year are expected to better service the development, implementation and monitoring of government policies, programs and projects; evidence-based decision making; industrial and market analysis and projection; and energy use literacy, education and stakeholder engagement.