PDF Version | Table of Contents | Next Page
Energy is used in all five sectors of the economy: residential, commercial/institutional, industrial, transportation and agriculture. In 2009, these sectors used a total of 8,541.6 PJ of energy. The industrial sector accounted for the largest share of energy, followed by transportation, residential, commercial/institutional and agriculture. Total GHG emissions associated with the energy use of the five sectors was 463.9 Mt in 2009.
Figures 2.1 and 2.2 show the distribution of secondary energy use and GHG emissions by sector. Energy consumed by the transportation and agriculture sectors is relatively more GHG-intensive than the other sectors.
Natural gas and electricity are the main types of end-use energy purchased in Canada. Natural gas and electricity are used in all sectors of the economy, while motor gasoline is mainly used in the transportation and agriculture sectors. In 2009, natural gas and electricity accounted for almost half the energy used in Canada (Figure 2.3). Motor gasoline and other oil products (diesel fuel oil, light fuel oil, kerosene and heavy fuel oil) represented approximately 33 percent of energy use.
Between 1990 and 2009, energy use in Canada increased by 23 percent, from 6,936.1 PJ to 8,541.6 PJ (Figure 2.4). At the same time, the Canadian population grew 22 percent (approximately 1 percent per year) and GDP increased 57 percent (about 2 percent per year). More generally, energy use per unit of GDP declined, while energy use on a per capita basis increased.
The industrial sector uses the most energy in our economy, consuming 3,168.4 PJ of energy in 2009. However, energy use growth in the commercial/institutional and transportation sectors outpaced all other sectors. Over the 1990–2009 period, the commercial/institutional sector registered a 37 percent increase in energy use (Figure 2.5), driven mainly by a 170 percent increase in auxiliary equipment energy use. Transportation energy use grew by 37 percent primarily due to a 67 percent growth in freight energy use.
Growth in energy use was reflected in growth of GHG emissions. In 2009, Canada’s GHG emissions excluding electricity-related emissions declined 1 percent compared to 2008, while emissions including those from electricity generation fell 4 percent. As demand for electricity dropped 4.7 percent in 2009, the mix of electricity generation also changed. In particular, between 2008 and 2009, decline in electricity generated from coal contributed to 52 percent of the total decline in electricity generated. Consequently, total CO2 emissions decreased 16 percent in 2009 compared to 2008. The CO2 emissions avoided from the reduction of coal use contributed 83.6 percent to the total CO2 decrease. The transportation sector experienced the highest growth in emissions at 36 percent followed by the commercial/institutional sector at 29 percent (Figure 2.6).
The transportation sector accounted for the largest proportion, 38 percent, of energy-related emissions (178.3 Mt CO2e), followed by the industrial sector, 31 percent (144.5 Mt CO2e), including electricity-related emissions. This difference in the shares of energy and emissions is driven by the dominance of refined petroleum products in the transportation sector providing for a more GHG-intensive energy mix.
Canada improved its energy efficiency between 1990 and 2009. The following section discusses two indicators of energy efficiency: energy intensity and an energy efficiency measure using factorization.
Energy intensity, when defined as the amount of energy required per unit of activity (GDP), improved 21 percent between 1990 and 2009 (Figure 2.7). This reduction in energy intensity reflects an overall improvement in energy efficiency, which is how effectively energy is being used in producing one unit of GDP. More simply, if the economy in 2009 had produced the same level of GDP that it did in 1990, it would have used much less energy.
Conversely, the amount of energy required per capita, which is the energy intensity for each individual, increased 1 percent between 1990 and 2009 (Figure 2.7). This upward trend in part reflects the increasing use of electronic goods, increasing ownership of passenger light trucks and increasing distance and weight of goods transported by heavy trucks. In other words, although Canada is producing economic value more efficiently, each household is using a greater number of energy-consuming goods and services per capita compared to 1990. This is despite the fact that many electronic goods have become increasingly energy-efficient since 1990.
This edition of Energy Efficiency Trends in Canada marks a change in the factorization process that allows us to more accurately reflect changes in the pure energy efficiency effect. In particular, we have included a separate estimate of the impact of changes in capacity utilization with respect to energy use. The impact of capacity utilization became very noticeable in 2009 as the downturn in the industrial sector occurred, and many processes operated substantially below capacity but continued to require threshold levels in energy use. The analysis has been conducted back through time, which has the effect of smoothing out the trend in energy efficiency. Although detailed analysis is limited to the industrial sector because of data availability, the impact can be seen in the aggregate savings.
One of the greatest sources of untapped energy is the energy we waste. Isolating and tracking energy efficiency in the Canadian economy is carried out in a conscious effort to publicize this energy resource. This analysis examines all areas of the economy to determine what would have happened had there been no improvements and to identify, from the underlying data, areas that can continue to improve energy efficiency.
Energy efficiency refers to how effectively energy is used to provide a certain level of service or output. To isolate the effect of energy efficiency in the economy, as well as in individual sectors, the analysis uses a factorization method. Factorization separates the changes in the amount of energy used into six effects: activity, structure, weather, service level, capacity utilization rate and energy efficiency.
As Figure 2.8 indicates, without significant ongoing improvements in energy efficiency in end-use sectors, energy use would have increased 46 percent between 1990 and 2009 instead of 23 percent. These energy savings of 1,560.4 PJ are equivalent to the energy use of about 26 million cars and passenger light trucks in 2009.
Figure 2.9 illustrates the relative impact of each effect on energy use over the 1990–2009 period for the economy as a whole. The following is a summary of and rationale for the results: