3. Benchmarking Results

The results of the benchmarking project are presented in three sections:

Section 3.1: Benchmarking Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions of Canadian Ammonia Producers (2000–2002) – This section provides an overview of the data for the Canadian industry, describes the operations involved in the project and presents data on energy efficiencies and CO2 emissions for the sector.

Section 3.2: Global Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions Comparisons (2002) – Canadian ammonia plant energy efficiencies and CO2 emissions were compared with those of other ammonia plants throughout the world. Results were reported by global regions. Ammonia and urea productions used in this report are based on the International Fertilizer Development Center’s worldwide plant capacity data.

Section 3.3: “World Top” Performance and Future Projections – This section reviews where Canadian facilities rank versus “world top” performance. A look at future low-energy designs is also included.

 

Factors that influence energy efficiency and CO2 emissions production

A number of factors influence the energy efficiency and CO2 emissions production of each operation, and no attempt has been made to correct for differences related to the following:

Catalyst conditions: plant efficiency declines as operating catalysts age.

Catalyst reductions: as old catalysts are replaced, some new catalysts require a reduction procedure before they can be placed into service. Frequently, this involves an energy loss when reduction gases are vented.

Climatic conditions: plants operate in cold or warm climates or at high or low elevations.

Environmental energy requirements: various plants operate supplemental systems to reduce emissions, such as process condensate stripping and steam injection to gas turbines.

Equipment performance: poor equipment performance can adversely affect the plant’s operational energy efficiency.

Feedstock pre-treatment requirements: some feedstocks have higher sulphur content than others and may require additional pre-treatment.

Feedstock quality: some feedstocks have high inert levels or excessive levels of high molecular weight hydrocarbons; any compression requirements are considered to be inside battery limits.

Internal recycle streams: through the prudent recycling of off-gases and hydrogen, the plant’s energy efficiency can be enhanced.

Operating factor: this is the percent of the year that the plant is operating and producing ammonia (i.e., no provisions are made for shutdowns or production cutbacks).

Process technology used to produce ammonia: some processes are more energy efficient than others (e.g., ICI-Katalco LCA process, Kellogg KAAP process).

Section 3.1: Benchmarking Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions of Canadian Ammonia Producers (2000–2002)

Currently, there are 11 ammonia plants operating in Canada. A list of the 10 Canadian ammonia plants operated by six companies that participated in the benchmarking study and the corresponding rated production capacity are provided in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Canadian Ammonia Plants Participating in 2000–2002 Benchmarking Project
Company and plant name Location Rated production capacity
(thousand metric tonnes/yr)
Agrium Carseland Carseland AB 535
Agrium Fort Saskatchewan Fort Saskatchewan AB 465
Agrium Joffre* Joffre AB 450
Agrium Redwater #2 Redwater AB 950
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Medicine Hat 1
Medicine Hat AB 530
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Medicine Hat 2
Medicine Hat AB 530
Saskferco Ammonia Belle Plaine SK 625
Sherritt Ammonia Fort Saskatchewan AB 155
Simplot Brandon Brandon MB 425
Terra Courtright 2 Courtright ON 412

* Note: All facilities use natural gas feedstock for ammonia production except Joffre, which uses by-product hydrogen stream. Joffre plant data are not included in inter-plant comparisons that include feedstock energy data.

3.1.1 Ammonia Production and Energy Use

Average annual net energy efficiency for the 10 Canadian plants over the three-year benchmarking study remained constant at 33.8 GJ/t NH3, as shown in Figure 2. However, the feedstock and fuel energy has decreased from 33.5 to 32.8 GJ/t NH3. This 2 percent improvement resulted in the same percentage reduction in CO2 generation. Net energy remained constant since other energy use offset the reduction in feedstock and fuel energy.

Figure 2: Canadian Ammonia Producers Average Efficiency Trend (2000–2002)

Figure 2: Canadian Ammonia Producers Average Efficiency Trend (20002002)

The three-year average normalized or net ammonia plant energy efficiencies for the natural gas feedstock Canadian plants are shown in Figure 3. The efficiencies of the nine natural gas-based plants range from 29.7 to 42.3 GJ/t NH3, with an average for natural gas plants (NG) of 34.4 GJ/t NH3. The group average is 33.2 GJ/t NH3, with the hydrogen-based plant included. The most energy-efficient plant uses approximately 70 percent of the energy used by the least energy-efficient plant, per tonne of ammonia production.

Average*
(GJ/t NH3)
High*
(GJ/t NH3)
Low*
(GJ/t NH3)
34.4 42.3 29.7

* NG: natural gas plants using lower heating value (LHV) for gas.

Figure 3: Normalized Plant Net Energy Efficiency (2000–2002)

Figure 3: Normalized Plant Net Energy Efficiency (20002002)

3.1.2 Ammonia Production and CO2 Emissions

Canadian ammonia plants generate 7 459 188 t/yr CO2 (average over 2000–2002). All of the natural gas-based ammonia plants in Canada also produce urea. Urea production combines two molecules of ammonia with one molecule of CO2 to form urea and water in solution. The urea solution is evaporated to form urea granular fertilizer. A total of 3 013 689 t/yr CO2 is used for urea production. This is a 40 percent recovery factor for CO2 that would otherwise be emitted to the atmosphere.

Specific CO2 generation ranges from 1.66 to 1.98 t CO2/t NH3 for the natural gas feedstock ammonia plants (as shown in Table 2). The variability is primarily due to the energy efficiency of the plant and, to a lesser extent, the carbon content of the feedstock and fuel (see Factors that influence energy efficiency and CO2 emissions production). More energy-efficient plants have a lower specific CO2 generation since less fuel and feedstock are used to produce the same amount of ammonia.

Table 2: Canadian Ammonia Producers CO2 Recovery Emissions (2000–2002)
  Average (NG)
(t CO2/t NH3)
High
(t CO2/t NH3)
Low
(t CO2/t NH3)
Total CO2
Generation
1.68 1.98 1.66
Total CO2
Recovered
0.61 1.11 0.30
Total CO2 Emitted 1.07 1.68 0.55

The favourable impact of recovering some of the process-generated CO2 is shown in Figure 4. Because all the natural gas-based plants are associated with urea plants, they recover otherwise vented CO2 for urea production. Specific recovery ranges from 0.30 to 1.11 t CO2/t NH3 for an overall average of 0.61 t CO2/t NH3.

The resulting total CO2 emissions from ammonia facilities (total generated – total recovered) range from 0.55 to 1.68 t CO2/t NH3, with average specific CO2 emissions of 1.07 t CO2/t NH3 from natural gas-based plants. The specific CO2 emissions levels for each plant are also presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4: CO2 Recovery and Emissions – Specific Basis

Figure 4: Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Emissions Specific Basis

Section 3.2: Global Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions Comparisons (2002)

Canadian ammonia plant energy efficiencies and CO2 emissions were compared with those of other ammonia plants throughout the world. There are 71 countries that produce ammonia and 58 that produce urea. For reporting purposes, these countries were grouped into 13 regions (Table 3). Ammonia and urea productions used in this report are based on the International Fertilizer Development Center’s worldwide plant capacity data.

3.2.1 Ammonia Production Energy Efficiencies

Canadian plants rank first as the most feed-and-fuel energy-efficient plants in the world.

CO2 generation and emissions from ammonia plants are calculated using feed plus fuel energy (FFE) efficiencies rather than net energy efficiencies. FFE relates directly to the CO2 generated within the ammonia plant, whereas net energy efficiencies include electrical usage and adjustments for other energy debits and credits, which can have associated offsite CO2 emissions not directly from the ammonia plant.

Estimated FFE efficiencies for each global region are shown in Figure 5. These range from 33.1 to 40.4 GJ/t NH3, with a world average of 38.6 GJ/t NH3. Canada ranks first in having the most FFE-efficient plants. These plants generate the least amount of CO2/NH3 production.

Global Ammonia Plant Energy Efficiency
Average
(GJ/t NH3)
High
(GJ/t NH3)
Low
(GJ/t NH3)
Canada
(GJ/t NH3)
38.6 40.4 33.1 33.1

Figure 5: Estimated Ammonia Plant Energy Efficiency by Global Region

Figure 5: Estimated Ammonia Plant Energy Efficiency by Global Region

3.2.2 Estimated CO2 Emissions From Ammonia Production

CO2 emissions were calculated using ammonia and urea production estimates and a 79.5 percent capacity utilization for each global region. Canadian estimates were based on actual 2002 production from the nine natural gas-based ammonia plants. CO2 emissions from ammonia production are derived from the combustion of natural gas used as a fuel and from the steam reformation process used to derive the hydrogen stream from the natural gas used as a feedstock. These CO2 emissions streams are referred to as fuel and process (or feed) respectively.

Total world ammonia production for 2002 is estimated to be 128 megatonnes (Mt). Total CO2 generation from these ammonia plants is estimated to be 275 Mt. Approximately 62 percent, or 170 Mt CO2, is process- or feed-related. A significant amount (28.5 percent) of total CO2 generated is recovered for use in urea production, leaving CO2 emissions of 197 Mt from ammonia plants throughout the world. The global CO2 generation and emissions estimates for 2002 are summarized in Figure 6.

Figure 6: CO2 Generation and Emissions From Ammonia Plants

Figure 6: Carbon Dioxide Generation and Emissions From Ammonia Plants

Gross CO2 generation from ammonia plants and emissions net of CO2 used in urea production in the various regions of the world are shown in Figure 7. China ranks first with the highest CO2 emissions (21.9 percent), and Oceania has the least. Canada is among the regions with the least CO2 emissions, ranking 11th (highest to lowest), and emits 2.2 percent of the world’s total CO2 from ammonia plants.

Figure 7: CO2 Generated and Emitted by Region (2002)

Figure 7: Carbon Dioxide Generated and Emitted by Region (2002)

On a per tonne of production basis, CO2 generation from ammonia production ranges from 1.84 to 2.24 t CO2/t NH3, with a world average of 2.14 t CO2/t NH3. Canada and Western Europe are the most efficient regions, with generation factors of 1.81 and 1.84 respectively.

  Average
(t CO2/
t NH3)
High
(t CO2/
t NH3)
Low
(t CO2/
t NH3)
Canada
(t CO2/
t NH3)
Global CO2 Generated per Tonne
of Ammonia Production
2.14 2.24 1.81 1.81
Global CO2 Emitted per Tonne
of Ammonia Production
2.14 2.23 0.91 1.11

Canada and Western Europe are the most efficient regions, with generation factors of 1.81 and 1.84 respectively.

When the CO2 that has been captured and used in urea production is accounted for, total CO2 emissions from ammonia production range from 0.91 to 2.23 t CO2/t NH3. Canada is the second-lowest region in terms of emissions per tonne of ammonia production, at 1.11 t CO2/t NH3. Figure 8 presents the specific CO2 generation and emissions rates by region for 2002.

Figure 8: Specific CO2 Generation and Emission Rates (2002)

Specific Carbon Dioxide Generation and Emission Rates (2002)

Section 3.3: “World Top” Performance and Future Projections

3.3.1 Worldwide Benchmarking

Two of the Canadian plants are “world top” plants – those that rank in the top decile globally in terms of energy efficiency.

Nearly all the worldwide commercial production of ammonia is from hydrocarbon feedstocks and fuels. As mentioned previously, improving the energy efficiency of ammonia production is an important strategy to reduce CO2 emissions.

Benchmarking the energy efficiency of individual ammonia plants is an effective way to measure plant performance against other producers and determine the best performers in the world. It provides a quantitative measure of what is possible with today’s technology and can be used to assess the feasibility of making improvements. Figure 9 shows the performance of the individual Canadian ammonia plants against other plants around the globe.

Figure 9: Net Energy Efficiencies (Normalized)

Figure 9: Net Energy Efficiencies (Normalized)

3.3.2 Canada in “World Top” Rankings

The Agrium plant in Joffre, Alberta, is an excellent Canadian example of inter-plant integration. A by-product hydrogen stream from an adjacent facility replaces the need for steam reforming of natural gas to supply the feedstock for ammonia production.

A “world top” rating ranks plants in 10 groups according to energy efficiency. If a plant is ranked in the top group, it is considered world top. An ammonia plant with an energy efficiency of 32.6 GJ/t NH3 or lower is considered to be world top. As noted previously, Canadian ammonia production is energy efficient. Comparing global regions, the nine Canadian ammonia producers are the second-most efficient, following the Western European producers. The average net energy efficiency of the nine Canadian producers is 34.1 GJ/t NH3. This is 11 percent better than the world average of 38.5 GJ/t NH3.

3.3.3 The Future of Ammonia Plant Low-Energy Designs

Modern ammonia production technology began in the 1960s. The energy efficiency of these plants was typically 39.5 GJ/t. The efficiency of newly designed plants improved substantially, as numerous innovative concepts were developed. Designs of 28.0 GJ/t became available in 1991. Since then, improvements have continued but at a much reduced rate. Currently, low energy designs approaching 27.0 GJ/t are being offered.

The best estimate of future improvements in the efficiency of low-energy ammonia plants comes from Ammonia: Principles and Industrial Practice. After an extensive review of the history of industrial ammonia production and current technologies, the author, Max Appl, makes the following broad predictions:

  • Natural gas will remain the preferred feedstock for at least the next 10 to 15 years. Coal gasification will not play a major role in ammonia production in that period.
  • The present ammonia technology will not change fundamentally, at least in the next 10 to 15 years. Even if there are radical, unforeseeable developments, they will take time to reach commercial introduction.
  • With the traditional concepts, the margins of additional improvements have become small after years of intensive research and development.
  • Only minor improvements of individual steps, catalysts and equipment are expected.
  • There is unlikely to be any further significant reduction in the energy consumption of the natural-gas-based steam-reforming ammonia process; figures between 27 and 28 GJ/t are already close to the theoretical minimum, which is 20.9 GJ/t.
  • For the next 10 to 15 years, the bulk of ammonia production will still be produced in world-scale plants of 1000–2000 tonnes per day NH3. Small capacity plants will be limited to locations where special logistical, financial or feedstock conditions favour them.
  • New developments in ammonia technology will mainly reduce investment costs and increase operational reliability. Smaller integrated process units contribute to this reduction and give additional savings by simplifying piping and instrumentation. Reliability may be improved by advances in catalyst and equipment quality and by improved instrumentation and computer control.
Recently completed Process Integration (PI) studies at Canadian ammonia production facilities have highlighted opportunities to improve the integration between ammonia and urea plants. By looking for opportunities to further include PI methodologies during the design phase of new ammonia and urea plants, future plants can be built with even greater energy efficiency and at lower or minor incremental capital cost.

With this forecast in mind, the improvement in the consumption of fuel energy of new low-energy design plants is estimated to continue at a slower rate than that experienced over 1991–2003, where the Energy Improvement Factor (EIF) averaged 1.0 percent of the fuel per year. From now through 2014, it is estimated that the fuel consumption improvement will be 35 percent less than that during the previous decade. This equates to a 0.65 percent per year EIF. The energy efficiency of these low-energy designs is expected to drop from 6.2 to 5.8 GJ/t, while process efficiency will remain fixed by chemistry. The total energy efficiency in 2014 will be 26.7 GJ/t.