| Arena type | Renovations/ retrofits | Energy efficiency after renovations/ retrofitts | Arenas | Renovations | Floor space | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | QI | # | QI | millions of m2 | QI | Share (%) | |||
| Stand-alone single rink arenas | None | N/A | 565 | A | N/A | A | 1.85 | A | 50.7 |
| One or more | Increased energy efficiency | 168 | A | 508 | A | 0.53 | A | 14.5 | |
| Same energy efficiency | 68 | A | 127 | A | 0.20 | A | 5.5 | ||
| No prior system to compare | 334 | A | 577 | A | 1.07 | A | 29.4 | ||
| Subtotal renovations | 569 | A | 1,212 | A | 1.80 | A | 49.3 | ||
| Subtotal | 1,134 | A | 1,212 | A | 3.65 | A | 100.0 | ||
| Stand-alone multi rink arenas | None | N/A | 115 | A | N/A | A | 0.92 | A | 50.6 |
| One or more | Increased energy efficiency | 28 | A | 115 | A | 0.26 | A | 14.1 | |
| Same energy efficiency | 14 | B | 51 | B | 0.09 | B | 5.0 | ||
| No prior system to compare | 74 | A | 152 | A | 0.53 | A | 29.3 | ||
| Subtotal renovations | 117 | A | 318 | A | 0.89 | A | 49.4 | ||
| Subtotal | 232 | A | 318 | A | 1.81 | A | 100.0 | ||
| Multiplex sports complexes and professional sports venues | None | N/A | 311 | A | N/A | A | 2.49 | A | 39.5 |
| One or more | Increased energy efficiency | 188 | A | 589 | A | 1.39 | A | 22.1 | |
| Same energy efficiency | 37 | A | 94 | A | 0.27 | A | 4.3 | ||
| No prior system to compare | 280 | A | 516 | A | 2.14 | A | 34.0 | ||
| Subtotal renovations | 505 | A | 1,199 | A | 3.81 | A | 60.5 | ||
| Subtotal | 816 | A | 1,199 | A | 6.30 | A | 100.0 | ||
| Canada | None | N/A | 991 | A | N/A | A | 5.26 | A | 44.7 |
| One or more | Increased energy efficiency | 385 | A | 1,212 | A | 2.18 | A | 18.5 | |
| Same energy efficiency | 119 | A | 273 | A | 0.57 | A | 4.8 | ||
| No prior system to compare | 687 | A | 1,244 | A | 3.75 | A | 31.9 | ||
| Subtotal renovations | 1,191 | A | 2,729 | A | 6.50 | A | 55.3 | ||
| Total | 2,182 | A | 2,729 | A | 11.76 | A | 100.0 | ||
Notes:
(1) Due to rounding, numbers may not add up to the total shown, and some numbers may differ from one table to the next.
(2) Quality indicators (QI) classify each estimate according to its quality as follows: A–Excellent, B–Good, C–Acceptable, F–Unreliable, and X–suppressed due to confidentiality.
(3) Table includes all renovations having occurred between January 2010 and March 2014.